The premise
It rests on two bodies of knowledge that rarely meet. The first draws from research on psychological wellbeing (Carol Ryff's dimensions, Seligman's PERMA, Harvard's flourishing studies, self-determination theory) and from the branch of medicine that traces a symptom back through a whole life rather than treating it only where it surfaces. Each element was examined for its evidence and its limits.
The second comes from organizational diagnosis: the whole-system approach used in strategic advisory work, where an enterprise is never examined one department at a time and a problem in one area is traced to its cause in another. That approach has been adapted to an individual life.
How it works
The intake is a written journal, not a quiz, and it keeps no clock. You can move through it in one long evening or leave it and return across a week. What surfaces on the second sitting is often closer to the truth than what you offered on the first.
It looks at five territories of a life: the body, the mind, relationships, work and resources, and the search for meaning. Within each it examines three layers: the state you are in; the determinants beneath it (sleep, load, history); and the dynamics that run between them—how a tired body clouds a sharp mind, or how unexpressed anger settles into physical tension.
State
The condition you are in right now, described in your own words.
Determinants
What sits beneath it: sleep, load, history, circumstance.
Dynamics
How the territories act on one another, and in which direction.
Your answers are not averaged into a score. They are read against one another, and a formulation emerges: where you are thriving, where you are worn thin, the single pattern beneath a dozen separate complaints, and the order in which to address them. That sequencing is borrowed from strategic analysis. A life's troubles are not a flat list. They fall in a sequence, and worked in the wrong order they do not shift.
One thing is never scored: you. The territories are tiles; you are the mosaic they make. Whether the life fits the woman living it is not a question a scale can answer. So the formulation closes with a reading of the whole pattern in plain sentences. It is a mirror. Where it has misread you, you say so, and it takes the correction.
Privacy and boundaries
This is not therapy, not medicine, and not a personality test. Where your material points toward a doctor or a therapist, the method says so first and tells you what to raise. Your journal is read and your formulation written by the system itself. Your words are never used to train any model, never shared, and are yours to delete whenever you wish.
A first reading, not a final verdict.